Search for: "N. V."
Results 1 - 20
of 39,123
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jul 2011, 4:39 am
Family Law Week has published two judgments in the case of N v N, which went before the Court of Appeal at the end of June. [read post]
3 Jul 2009, 8:20 am
It criticises the reasoning of the judgment N. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 1:02 pm
Am., Inc. v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 2:11 am
Regina v N; Regina v D; Regina v L Court of Appeal “The drafting of an indictment required close attention to the realities of the case and none at all to the theoretical legal possibilities which might arise. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 8:09 am
She finally was […] The post Lisa N. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 7:52 am
KARANJA v. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 7:27 am
OJO v. [read post]
20 May 2011, 2:15 am
Regina v D (N); Regina v P (A); Regina v U (S) [2011] WLR (D) 166 “Evidence that a defendant had viewed child pornography was capable of being adduced in evidence at trial under section 101(1)(d) of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 to demonstrate a propensity for offences involving the sexual abuse of children. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 3:05 am
Regina v T (N) [2010] EWCA Crim 711; [2010] WLR (D) 93 ”The prosecution were not entitled to apply for leave to appeal against a terminating ruling made by a judge in a Crown Court on a trial on indictment, unless it had complied with the mandatory requirements of s 58(4) and (8) of the Criminal Justice Act 2003, following the making of the ruling, of informing the court that it intended to appeal or requesting an adjournment to consider such an appeal and, before or at… [read post]
16 May 2013, 8:15 am
Bell v. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 7:28 am
JARVIS v. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 3:53 am
The Supreme Court handed down judgment in N v ACCG & Ors [2017] UKSC 22 on 22 Mar 2017. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 12:31 pm
VEHICULAR AGGRAVATED ASSAULT CONVICTION REVERSED – State v. [read post]
26 Aug 2008, 7:50 am
Regina v N Ltd and Another Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) “A trial judge could not assent to an application of no case to answer nor enter a verdict of not guilty before the close of the prosecution evidence without the clear consent of all the parties. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 8:49 am
Double N Earthmovers Ltd. v Edmonton (City), 213 AR 81 (ABQB), affd [2005] AJ No 221 (ABCA), affd 2007 SCC 3, [2007] 1 SCR 116, online: LexUM http://scc.lexum.org/en/2007/2007scc3/2007scc3.html This case is addresses the issue of compliance with the terms of a call for tenders. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 1:33 am
Regina (E) v Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust; Regina (N) v Secretary of State for Health Court of Appeal “A policy of prohibiting smoking in the premises of an NHS trust, which had the consequence of a ban on smoking for those detained in a high security psychiatric hospital, did not violate the patients' human rights and was [...] [read post]
22 May 2008, 4:43 am
R (G) v Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust [2008] EWHC 1096 (Admin); R (N) v Secretary of State for Health; R (B) v Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust; [2008] WLR (D) 162 “A provision which had the effect of prohibiting smoking in a high security psychiatric hospital was not incompatible with the human rights of detained mental patients and was not unlawful. [read post]
28 May 2008, 1:15 am
Regina (G) v Nottingham Healthcare NHS Trust; Regina (N) v Secretary of State for Health; Regina (B) v Nottingham Healthcare NHS Trust Queen’s Bench Divisional Court “Preventing detained mental patients from smoking was not a breach of article 8, right to respect for private and family life, or article 14, prohibiting discrimination, of the European Convention on Human Rights. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 9:08 am
Case citation: Steak N Shake, Inc. v. [read post]
